Sunday, January 31, 2010
But this one seems different.
But thirty dogs being kept by an isolated individual living alone in a truck seems like an out of control situation and when it comes down to it, if they hadn't have been shot its seems highly probable the SPCA or the Police would have eventually have had to do the deed.
And if they had how then would have the story been reported?
The reality is for human beings to function and prosper in this world we have to kill things and we do it every day.
City people can divorce themselves from this reality as they select their shrink wrapped lamb chops from the super market freezer but never-the-less animals die that we may live every day.
In any case John Key is going to consider fast tracking legislation to increase penalties for animal cruelty according to the Sunday Star Times.
Which is a populist response but one that shuts the stable door after the horse has bolted because those that inflict unnecessary suffering on animals are people lacking in any sort of empathy and no matter how severe the penalties these individuals will never gain it.
And it is why their are those in our midst who do see the suffering in others, human or animal, as something for their amusement that is the real question.
And if the politicians could find some way of answering that we would all be grateful.
But as it is they shoot from the hip with the only weapon in their arsenal which is more laws and tougher penalties.
And the reason why politicians will never be able to fix this problem no matter how many laws they enact is because they are looking for answers in the wrong place.
Today is the second Sunday of the Triodian.
Last Sunday , the Sunday of the Sunday of the Publican and the Pharisee, I wrote on how the Eastern Church spends the Four Sundays before Lent by preparing us for it.
For the unchurched, the reason why we go to Church is for healing, not so much for the physical healing of our bodies but for the spiritual healing of our souls, a far more important matter, and something we all are in need of no matter how far along our journeys we may be.
Today's Gospel reading is Luke 15:11-32, the parable of the Prodigal Son, and hence today is called Prodigal Son Sunday.
This is a parable deep and full of meaning but the lesson and the thing the Church wants us to reflect upon today is contained in the hymn we will sing today during the Divine Liturgy
I have recklessly forgotten Your glory, O Father;
And among sinners I have scattered the riches which You had given me.
Therefore, I cry to You like the Prodigal:
"I have sinned before You, O compassionate Father;
Receive me a penitent and make me as one of Your hired servants."
Saturday, January 30, 2010
There's been a fair few websites I've visited recently that run advertisements down the sidebar, in the middle of news articles and across the top page. And a fair few of those (or perhaps the ones I am unable to zone out of my mind) show flab, fat and pale white skin.
After getting an eyeful of the before and the promise of the after, one presumably sends money in exchange for pills or a mysterious non-surgical stomach stapling product that requires monthly payments. The result might be lean, ripped and muscular men, or toned, athletic and shapely woman, but it's all just too much information when it's on every fourth web page.
I haven't seen any enticements for steroids though, but what do you reckon with these photos? Surely, impossible even with 12 eggs in every meal?
So don't worry, NZC will stay advertisement free when it comes to weight loss products. Is that good news? Well, this message was made possible by our sponsor. Email me for a free catalogue, and send no money now.
And yet he was a monster who amongst his other crimes gassed 5000 people in the town of Halabja. Virtually nobody mourns his passing.
Meanwhile in London Tony Blair is being grilled by yet another inquiry into his role in the events that saw Chemical Ali, and his Cousin Saddam Hussein bought to justice.
Its a circus outside of course - the usual suspects accusing Tony Blair of being a war criminal whilst seemingly oblivious of the crimes against humanity committed by the regime he help to overthrow and the war criminals he helped bring to justice.
The BBC begins its reportage
Tony Blair's appearance in front of the Iraq inquiry was marked by his determination to justify his decision to take Britain into the war on Iraq in 2003.Now why the BBC should expect a "mea culpa" or an "apology" remains a mystery to me.
There was no mea culpa moment and no apology. He made a brief admission about being "sorry" about the divisions the war caused but said he took responsibility and had no regrets. Saddam had been a "monster".
There seems little to apologize for - indeed the world is a better place without Saddam and his henchmen and it would be hard to argue otherwise.
There is a vivid passage in "Slaughterhouse Five" where Billy Pilgrim is woken up by his doorbell, looks out the window and sees a cripple on his doorstep, another at the house across the street and a limousine parked up the road. He knows it is a scam and the man in the limo is using cripples to sell Christmas Cards which will never arrive. so he calls the police.
And haven't we all been caught this way.
And we all know this, several times a week I get called by someone who is raising money for this or that worthy cause. And the person on the end of the line is often being paid for doing it - out of the money collected. I don't blame them for that - they need the work. But very little of the money collected in this manner can actually be used for the purported purpose for which it is being collected.
Anyway there are charities of long standing which do do great things in the community, necessary things and one of those would have to be the IHC.
From time to time I visit an IHC house, with eight residents - middle aged men not really capable of independent existence. And this house provides home and shelter for them.
So it is sickening to read that money freely given to the IHC to help support such programs, which we all should, has been embezzled by the IHC's fund raising manager.
You wonder how such people sleep at night.
Friday, January 29, 2010
Todays Herald has one Dr George Thomson, from Otago University, Wellington, calling on the Government to take action over smoking - based upon an article he has published in the New Zealand Medical Journal.
"There's now a need for politicians to embrace and act on the idea of a foreseeable and planned end to tobacco sales through a predicable timetable by 2020. The public wants more defined action to reduce smoking, and not a series of incremental steps."In other words more bans. Well I'm "the public" and I don't want more bans.
The rationale behind all of this is based upon statistics the good Dr Thompson is bandying about.
According to him
About 21 per cent of New Zealanders smoked, causing more than 4000 deaths a year and $1.5 billion in health costs..Well apart from the fact I doubt these numbers are well founded the sad reality is about twenty-eight thousand New Zealanders die per annum - so 14% of all deaths are caused by smoking - yeah right.
Smoking does lead to premature death in some individuals of that there is no doubt whatsoever but this does not place an additional burdon on the health system, on the contrary it helps reduce that burden since a smoker who dies at sixty-five say will not require hip replacements at seventy-five and years of intensive care from eighty-five until death from Alzheimer's disease. And everyone dies and the vast majority consume some health resources as they do.
In any case politicians wont go for this - tobacco taxes generate over a Billion dollars in revenue each year.
How we reduce the incidence of smoking in the community is a good question but Government bans are not the answer.
He also attacked "bludgers" who evade the top tax rate or rip off ACC and welfare.
It's not clear if he had changed topics or was still getting stuck into the public service executives. What next? Bring back the 60% tax rate? Is Goff even slightly embarrassed his government had instigated 5% automatic pay rises for top Government earners when they were running the show?
Mr Goff said even the Conservatives in Britain were proposing the same sort of cap.
That would be "the same sort of cap" that's actually different.
Initially, I thought this idea stupid, and perhaps many on the right will agree. Then I thought through my own personal preference for shrinking Government and getting them to focus only on core issues. Attacking the government in this way may yield the same result. If Goff wants to run a party based on extreme left wing politics, but is prepared to restrict such ideas only to government, then maybe this is an experiment worth watching?
Fresh from complaining about Avatar recycling "indigenous stereotypes" he is now complaining about the new Air New Zealand cabin crew uniforms.
According to him
Maori symbols such as the koru on the Trelise Cooper-designed uniforms did not treat the cultural symbols with respect.I am so glad that Air New Zealand has the good professors permission to use the Koru - its just a shame that they didn't comply with his his fashion sense when using it.
"It's way too busy and inelegant," he said.
"It's obviously been drawn by someone who doesn't appreciate the culture or understand the deeper symbolism."
Taonui said the Maori symbols on the uniforms each had different meanings and should not be randomly mixed together.
"When you look at traditional Maori sculpture ... each symbol is quite distinct," he said. "With [the uniform], they're sort of thrown together in seemingly no pattern."
He was happy for koru and other symbols to be used on clothing, provided it was done "with elegance".
The Air New Zealand uniforms did not do that.
Perhaps next time Air New Zealand is doing a redesign of its uniforms it should commission the University of Canterbury School of Maori and Indigenous Studies instead of looking to leading New Zealand Fashion houses.
Personally I, a mere male with little knowledge of womens fashion, have nothing to say about the aesthetics of the new uniforms.
I am more than happy to leave the fashion commentary up to professors of Indigenous Studies and the Womens Weekly.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
I have decided to publish some of these letters (hiding the surname) because it would seem the issues raised are actually very common to many people, and I trust such advice would be beneficial to our readers who find themselves in a similar situation.
I have been holding down a part time job for a few months now, and I see that the minimum wage is at least $12.75 per hour, with a proposal to get it to $15.00 per hour supported by many intelligent people, such as Jeanette Fitzsimmons. My current employer on the other hand only pays around $8 per hour. What do you suggest I do?
The thing is when his mother was carrying him she became very ill and was advised to have an abortion - obviously she didn't take that advice and equally obviously Tim Tebow is glad she didn't.
And now he is to appear in a pro life advertisement to be played during the super bowl.
And boy oh boy has that got some people into a tizz.
Get this from a Washington Post opinion writer.
Abortion rights groups are angry that CBS will run a pro-life ad during the Super Bowl from the rabidly homophobic and anti-abortion group Focus on the Family. Few have actually seen the 30-second spot. But we know that it will feature football phenom Tim Tebow, whose mother chose to ignore her doctor's advice to terminate her pregnancy.The thing is of course that the advice given to Tim Tebow's mother to abort him was clearly extremely bad advice and that is undeniable.
Did you catch that? Ms. Tebow was presented with a choice.
She was a missionary in the Philippines when she was stricken with amoebic dysentery. Doctors feared for her life and urged her to abort her fetus. That she would give birth to a son who would become the first underclassman to win the coveted Heisman Trophy is wonderful. Also wonderful is that Ms. Tebow was able to make an informed decision. Her doctors weren't muzzled by far-right zealots who want women to carry their pregnancies to term no matter what. And she wasn't forced by those doctors to end her pregnancy.
Focus on the Family is touting Ms. Tebow's right to choose while trying to deny the same opportunity -- the same right -- to other women. Whether CBS is right to run this advocacy ad after rejecting others in the past, I'll leave to others for the moment. But abortion rights advocates, such as the National Organization for Women, would do well to point out this hypocrisy with an ad of their own.
So the only counter argument is bluster.
The thing is have you ever heard of a child being mauled by a Shih tzu?
Or ever read of someone feeding kittens to one?
Of course not, these dogs love children, love playing and are generally not much of a problem at all. the worst thing they might do is to chew up the living room rug.
They still have to be registered and micro chipped just like any other dog though. And they are since the people who own such dogs are almost universally law abiding people.
On the other hand this is a pit bull, a dog which has been getting bad press in the last few days. Apart from the ghastly kitten story, there have been two children severely mauled by these animals in the past week.
And this is not a new phenomona, the reason why we have dog control laws is there have been multiple incidents involving these creatures and innocents going back decades.
Why anyone would want to own such a dog is a complete mystery to me, although I expect it has something to do with wanting to scare other people.
And since there has never been an incident where a Shih Tzu has caused any harm, well not that I know of, I am prepared to call this claim: People who blame the breed for the harm it causes "misinformed" - for what it is.
And that is utter BS
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
A senior Canadian climate scientist says the United Nations' panel on global warming has become tainted by political advocacy, that its chairman should resign, and that its approach to science should be overhauled.Now the interesting thing about this is, a few years ago Sixty Scientists wrote an open letter to the Canadian Prime Minister expressing doubts about the so called "consensus" on Global Warming.
Andrew Weaver, a climatologist at the University of Victoria, says the leadership of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has allowed it to advocate for action on global warming, rather than serve simply as a neutral science advisory body.
"There's been some dangerous crossing of that line," said Weaver on Tuesday, echoing the published sentiments of other top climate scientists in the U.S. and Europe this week.
"Some might argue we need a change in some of the upper leadership of the IPCC, who are perceived as becoming advocates," he told Canwest News Service. "I think that is a very legitimate question."
As it happens this very same gentleman who is now lamenting leading lights in the IPCC as "crossing the line" into advocacy not only signed but helped to organize this response to the skeptics letter.
And when you see things like this happening you might be forgiven for thinking the jig is up.
The point is that Labour doesn’t need to employ marketing tricks to dupe ‘ordinary’ New Zealanders into thinking they represent them, since (in theory, at least) they actually DO represent them.
According to TVNZ the Government will get a grilling over our role in Afghanistan when it resumes sitting next month.
And for outright lunacy read this from John Minto on the topic.
Political activist John Minto said New Zealand's most decorated living soldier Willie Apiata was "no hero" compared to three peace activists who attacked Marlborough's Waihopai spy base.For what its worth - an attack of Western Civilization came out of Afghanistan.
"The real heroes of Afghanistan are the three Kiwis who popped the dome two years ago," he said speaking at a protest today (Jan 23) outside the spy base, where up to 40 banner-waving demonstrators shouted "close Waihopai down".
Mr Minto said that Corporal Apiata, who won the Victoria Cross in Afghanistan for rescuing a wounded comrade under enemy fire, "was no hero compared to Sam, Adrian and Peter".
To be sure that attack took place in the United States of America but while directly impacting that nation in terms of carnage it was an attack upon us all. If you doubt me just ponder why it is you have to go through all that rigmarole every time you board a plane.
And while that particular attack remains thus far the most grievous, it was not the last outrage we the West have suffered.
And Afghanistan as a hotbed of Islamist violence was a boil that needed lanced. We need to establish some sort of order there as a matter of self preservation - a tough task but that's what we have soldiers for - thats why we train them and that is what we pay them for.
Keith Locke says the government's credibility is on the line over our role in Afghanistan - nope Keith Locke it is your credibility that is on the line and you have none, I say.
Enough of this silliness, let our guys get on with the job and let us honor them for what they do and let the Keith Lockes and John Mintos posture all they like, they are, in the immortal phrase of General Russel L. Honoré - Stuck on Stupid.
We will have to wait until Parliament resumes to see where Labour sits on this.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Anyway, here's my top 10.
Feel free to make up the other 5:
Meanwhile some better glacier news may be found here
And if you are still confused about where we are at with climate Change then this article in yesterdays Herald is unlikely to help you. It is merely a regurgitation of the talking points true believers have learned by rote and is a somewhat tired rendition of them in the question/answer format beloved by Government propagandists and loathed by those with brains since the questions are never the ones we want answered.
Anyway we all know the next really big story in Climate Change is on its way and it wont be about Glaciers, Corals or the Amazon rain forest- no it will be about this man and the ethics of his financial dealings. Indeed the linked story is the top story in the BBC's Environment section at time of posting.
And that has to be worrying news for him.
But even then a marked sea-change in the government’s attitude was underway, and by 2006, the succeeding Education Minister K. Horstmann, made clear its policy. He warned homeschooling families: “The education administration in future will also not recognize so-called homeschooling and act in proportionate measure considering the individual case and circumstances.”Proportionate measure has meant fines, threats of prison, armed police storming families' homes to snatch children in the middle of the night.
One family has fled to the US and is currently awaiting a verdict on their request for political asylum.
"If the political asylum application is granted it will be the first time America has ever granted political asylum to Christian home[-]schoolers fleeing from German persecution," said Donnelly.What's also incredibly interesting about this story is the German Government's statement in 2002 that they would not prosecute home-schoolers because their children "children “are generally not lacking in any other respects.” Yet, by 2006, a complete change of attitude. Just goes to show that just because a law is not enforced, does not mean that it will not be enforced in the future. Should make us here in NZ very nervous in regards to the anti-smacking law. Will our citizens be fleeing to the US in the future seeking political asylum as well?
Related link: LifeSiteNews
2010 Round 1: Mayor vows to stop 'satanic' gay parade
The cities refusal to issue permits for Gay Parades is being fought out in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg which unless I'm very much mistaken will evenually rule in favor of the activists.
The final Round for 2010 will take place on the 29th of May, when the Parade will go ahead with a handful of noisemakers, some if not most of whom will be imports there to make a splash as the inevitable clashes with the more unruly elements of Moscow society express their opinions on this event.
And the Guardian along with the BBC will sniffily report the clashes as evidence Russian Homophobia.
Its all quite boringly predictable and there will be a replay next year.
Monday, January 25, 2010
Williamson, in Tamworth for the annual country music festival, raised the ire of police on Saturday morning for remaining in the back of his ute unrestrained after a cavalcade along the main street of the town.Riding in the back of a Ute never used to trouble anyone, been there, done that many times and I'm still here. I haven't come through life unscathed, had a near thing or two in my time but that particular activity, riding on the back of a Ute never came close to nailing me.
Alongside him was a friend, who was also unrestrained.
The driver of the ute, believed to be Williamson's partner Meg Doyle, copped a $250 fine and received three demerit points.
Indeed one of my rugby coaches had a ute and half the team, or so it seemed, used to ride in the back to and from games. It was legal back then, nobody gave it a second thought.
I appreciate what with seat belt laws and all it is no longer allowed but in this case the law was ignored for the parade but not for the 500 meters or so the occupants had to travel back to their hotel. And that seems an absurdity.
Of course the real world is not risk free, no matter how many laws you enact people will still come to grief, its part of the deal called living.
Just how much cotton wool our rulers should wrap us in should be a subject for debate.
Riding on the back of a ute is a no no but free fall parachuting isn't, nor is mountaineering, playing polo or any number of hazardous activities I can think of.
My boy Nik used to give me the willies with his skateboard, come to think of it. But a boy has to spread his wings - no? Anyway he has moved on from it and apart from bruises and scrapes survived it as most of us do survive our impetuous youth.
No matter how you look at it, riding on the back of a ute after a parade seems at the very low end of risky activity and fining the driver $250 smackeroos seems a tad of an over reaction to me - and overly officious.
Give them half a chance and they'd be in favour of new sets of taxes on roads, petrol, diesel, fizzy drinks, possum fur, Indonesian sourced furniture, banks, deposit accounts, shares, hydro power, alcohol, non-approved tuck shop food, fatty food, fast food, foreign food, beef, lamb, chicken, fish, pork, plastic bags, new cars, old cars, construction, renovation, soap products, non-hemp clothing, teeth alignment, plastic surgery, religious institutions, non-government charities, catholic schools, non-recycled paper, advertising, business loans, television sets, socks, the SIS, the army, guns, toy guns (including water pistols), any children after the first one, farming, fishing, forestry, mining, the Tiwai Smelter, Invercargill in general, tourists, airports, exports not being shipped by sail boat, shower heads, single flush toilets, incandescent light bulbs, personal grooming products, closed shoes, and quite possibly "one or two minor things we'd like to add at the time the legislation is passed".
Have I missed anything?*
Last year on a day of weather most foul, I dropped Nik off at school. And since everybody else was doing the same, parking was atrocious, chaotic in fact. So I pulled up at the vacant bus stop, he alighted and off I went, happily oblivious to the pair of eyes that had been watching me.
And a few days later a parking infringement notice appeared in my letter box - for "parking" on a bus stop. Wouldn't have been there for more than 20 seconds but that was enough to cop a fine.
Hey ho - no appeal, forty dollars the poorer.
Well the truth is emerging - parking charges and infringement fees are a cash cow.
It seems Wellingtonian wardens are awarded Ipods and holidays if they issue the required number of notices or better.
Legend has it that Paul McCartney was more sanguine than most over a parking ticket he received while recording Sergeant Pepper - instead of becoming angry he penned the now famous song.
My guess is that the royalties from this song more than covered the infringement fee Mr McCartney (now Sir Paul) incurred that day, and thus he had no reason to be grumpy.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
The "evidence was overwhelming", we were told,and that most scientists agreed the time to act was now, if it wasn't too late already.
But since Climategate and Copenhagen all of this has unraveled and now Global Warming stories are beginning to appear which detail scientific malfeasance as well as financial shenanigans from insiders and bureaucrats.
Here is an example of how Global warming is reported today, from the Times.
The chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), has used bogus claims that Himalayan glaciers were melting to win grants worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Rajendra Pachauri's Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), based in New Delhi, was awarded up to £310,000 by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the lion's share of a £2.5m EU grant funded by European taxpayers.
It means that EU taxpayers are funding research into a scientific claim about glaciers that any ice researcher should immediately recognise as bogus. The revelation comes just a week after The Sunday Times highlighted serious scientific flaws in the IPCC's 2007 benchmark report on the likely impacts of global warming.
Now New Zealand has on its Statute Books a most pernicious piece of legislation which will make virtually everybody in this country poorer, as well as potentially putting thousands out of work by crippling the economy. This Legislation is predicated on the supposed coming Climate Catastrophe, which everybody now is coming to realize is a fraud.
So it is time to act on Climate Change and the action that needs to be taken is a Repeal of the Emissions Trading Scheme before it comes into force. An action which will benefit every New Zealander with the exception of the Emissions Traders.
But their little businesses have nothing of economic merit to contribute in any case.
That means for all of us, both Eastern and Western, Lent is four weeks away. And in light of this I would like to share my journey towards Easter with you with the Churches teaching for each of the Sundays which precede the Great Feast.
The Orthodox Church calls this part of the Church year the Lenten Triodion. It is a time of self reflection in preparation for Lent.
And to this end each of the Sundays in Triodion has a special theme and lesson.
Today is called the Sunday of the Publican and the Pharisee, the name coming from todays Gospel Reading: Luke 18:10-14.
And the lesson contained therein is clear, it is contained in the words of a hymn which will be sung in all Orthodox Churches around the world today
Let us flee from the pride of the Pharisee!
And learn humility from the Publican's tears!
Let us cry to our Savior,
Have mercy on us,
Only merciful One!
Saturday, January 23, 2010
I think I can solve this problem.
One of the ways we feel their impact is the inconveniences we undergo when flying.
And here is a sorry tale of a young woman flying to Detroit, go read it for yourself and then come back.
And we now live in an age where it has become a cartoon cliché to strip search grandmothers and to see the stuffed toys of children flying with their parents as potentially lethal items which need to be X-rayed. And all the while ignoring the obvious pointers to those who are really problematical passengers lest we give offense.
Indeed not giving offense to our enemies is our prime directive - all the while inconveniencing and sometimes offending the harmless innocent amongst us.
Well my friends I'm offended by the story I linked above, but just imagine for a moment the protagonist in this story was a swarthy bearded man rather than a pretty young student.
Can you imagine the ruckus it would cause?
Friday, January 22, 2010
Dear Antarctic Lemur,
This is a complete and totally apology for my behaviour at the breakdown of Sir Humphreys nearly three years ago. I should have backed you in your defence of the attacks upon your character by a commenter, rather than insisting the ban you decided upon went through a blog process.
I don't know if you are still reading the blogs, and I don't blame you if you are not, but anyway, I hope that this message gets your attention in some way.
Lucia Maria aka Lucyna.
He is claiming such laws breach New Zealand's Bill of Rights.
The father of New Zealand's Bill of Rights, you may recall was Sir Geoffrey Palmer, a notable wowser who if he had his way would restrict the sale of wine in supermarkets so it would be a superb irony if his brainchild was used to legalize cannabis use.
But I don't see that happening.
Its a story which is not News to all savvy NZ Conservative readers who will have been aware for days that the IPCC has been forced to admit that their report on the decline of Himalayan glaciers is way off the mark. Still the fact that Stuff is running with it, even if it is several days old is progress of sorts.
But back to the quote which finishes off the story as posted on Stuff
A number of scientists pointed out that at the end of the day, no one is disputing the Himalayan glaciers are shrinking.Its quite sad really, what is sinking is Global Warming hysteria which is now taken seriously, well, by practically no-one.
"What is happening now is comparable with the Titanic sinking more slowly than expected," de Boer said in his e-mail. "But that does not alter the inevitable consequences, unless rigorous action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is taken."
But there is still no sign of the government repealing that ridiculous ETS legislation. Sigh.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
There's always a bloody loophole. With news that National may whack on a land tax, the real estate agents are already offering "land tax free homes". The depreciation allowance might be lousy, but apparently it comes with a 2 billion dollar credit towards exploration. It's enough to make me want to up anchors and move.
Converted Oil Rig, now a palatial residence. 6 tennis courts. One helicopter pad. Guest quarters. Stunning Galley Kitchen. Views of the coast of New Zealand. Own microwave aerial. Crows Nest. Oil heating throughout, with 6000 year supply (based on a family of 4, 30 servants and 10 guests at any one time)
Outdoor pool. Close to fishing.
Phone: Bill Smith, 04 555 555
Reality Real Estate Ltd
Genuine buyers only.
Expecting offers over 1M.
Land Tax = $0
Rates = $0
May qualify as off shore tax haven.
This is the USNS Comfort.
She is a hospital ship with a thousand beds with a staff of 600. Comfort has just arrived in Haiti, part of operation Unified Response Haiti, to tend to the sick and suffering.
Comforts sister ship USNS Mercy performed a similar mission after the boxing day Tsunami.
I don't know about you but the concept of shifting a thousand bed hospital to remote parts of the world when they are in times of trial just fills me with awe.
And this is where it all goes off the rails.
The socialist definition of fair is different to the right wing (and National are basically running as a centrist party, their right wing remains mostly tucked under their shoulder).
To my mind, the fairest possible tax system would be a single, broad flat tax on either earnings or consumption, say 20%. Done.
The government then budgets to live within that income (a concept that seems to be missing from the tax reform discussions).
These references have been added by the manufacturer for years and nobody knew about them until a few days ago but once discovered the usual storm in teacup erupted. Someone might be offended. Which of course makes them "undesirable" and they will have to be removed.
Funnily enough nobody was offended by Patton's Prayer 65 years ago when the famous general asked God to provide more clement weather during the Battle of the Bulge. Which was forthcoming incidentally.
Nor indeed were they offended 1600 years ago when Constantine had used the phrase "εν τούτῳ νίκα" translated as "by this sign be victorious" or "in this sign conquer" when he adopted the Chi Rho, a Christian symbol for his armies. And indeed the Irish Brigade used the Latin version of this phrase "In Hoc Signo Vinces" on their regimental colors for many years.
But the shrinking violets of our times get all quivery at a biblical reference so discrete that nobody would even know it was there until its pointed out.
I wonder what it is about the Christian message which scares them so?
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
The top 10% of income earners now pay 44% of all personal income tax (if the impact of WfF, New Zealand Superannuation and other benefits including the unemployment benefit are included, the top 10% of taxpayers now pay 76% of net tax).
They also want to ensure the Government always gets the money they think they deserve:
A good tax system should minimise uncertainty over future tax rates and the future application of tax bases. This requires that there is a degree of assurance that the tax base will provide revenue adequacy now and in the future
Which can be taken several ways. I didn't see any reference to "locking in CPI increases on tax thresholds" and so forth, but I've only skimmed the report at this stage.
They naturally came up with some recommendations, and my crystal ball wasn't too far off the mark, I had been expecting most of these pronouncements (probably due to all the spoilers sneaking into the press):
No, it would be a universal tax.
He said the Government would find a way to exempt from the land tax properties with low per-hectare values.
So not universal then either?
When the Nazis occupying Greece started to persecute the Greek Jews the Archbishop sent the collaborating Prime Minister of Greece the following letter co-signed by leading Greek intellectuals.
According to Nicola Lamb in this mornings Herald not much has changed
On a personal level, Obama would appear to float above the tongue-tortured Texan. Rhetorical gusts, much less flights of fancy, were beyond Bush, whereas Obama puts the 'o's in oratory.But even as I write this a remarkable change is taking place and it is a change that President Obama can take a lot of responsibility for.
And yet for Obama, trudging through a landscape still strewn with Bush-era mines, it has been tough going - and not just because of the policy problems he inherited from his predecessor.
Continuity with the old administration marked the past year more than change from it.
And that is the election of a Republican to Senator Kennedy's old senate seat and by a massive margin by the looks of it.
Democracy, an emerging argument holds, is an inappropriate and ineffective political system to meet the challenges of the consequences of climate change in politics and society, particularly in the area of necessary emission reductions. Democratically organized societies are too cumbersome to avoid climate change; they act neither timely nor are they responsive in the necessary comprehensive manner. The "big decisions" to be taken need a strong state. The endless debate should end. We have to act -- that is the most important message. And that is why democracy in the eyes of these observers becomes an inconvenient democracy.
Via Contra Celsum: Dictatorship - I'll vote for that
It seems whenever a member of the Glitterati's lives come unglued there is a medical reason, unlike the great unwashed, such as ourselves, where of course it remains what it always has been - bad behavior.
Whether or not "rehab" serves any purpose other than providing a place of refuge for the rich and famous from the public gaze until the furore dies down I wouldn't like to say but I am curious as to what the customary treatment for "sex addiction" might be.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
“Why would you hand the keys to the car back to the same guys whose policies drove the economy into the ditch and then walked away from the scene of the accident?
Recall recent wins for workers: an increase from 3 to 4 weeks annual leave on top of 12 public holidays. Minimum super contribution from employers of 2%. Abolition of the youth rate.
Is this latest request sensible? Well, I think we have been presented the wrong question.
Instead of demanding the minimum wage go up, demand the government not tax the first $25K. Sure, they might have to budget and reduce expenditure down to essential items, but every other wage earner faces issues like that.
It would do a lot more for the economy, and all tax levels benefit.
And rather than insisting the minimum wage be indexed to the average wage (to make automatic rises of the minimum wage, insist the tax thresholds are indexed.
Employers, workers – everyone wins.
A condemnation these people for the most part choose to ignore.
Needless to say Microsoft have responded claiming the IE8 is the "most secure browser on the market".
I don't know about that, there will always be claims and counter claims but I for one have never been an IE fan.
The thing is you can build a web page which looks perfect in every browser until you try IE whereupon everything goes to hell in a hand basket. Natively IE8 is ok but it has a compatibility mode which if in force actually introduces the idiosyncrasys, actually bugs, which make IE such a pain to have to cater for.
Anyway I use Chrome for now but who knows for the future.
Whatever, I'm not sure the Government issuing software advisories is really step forward.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Today Pope Benedict XVI visited the Rome's main Synagogue, an event which no reasonable person could find fault with surely?
Well no - Pope Benedict gets right up the noses of those with a Liberal bent and the story becomes not one of joint worship, rather - "Anger over wartime pontiff Pius XII overshadows Pope’s synagogue visit".
That is the Times' take and the usual suspects have a similar view. And indeed there are Jews who are upset about the current Popes moves towards beatification of his wartime predecessor.
Could have Pius XII done more to aid European Jews during the dark days of World War II? Possibly - but he didn't do nothing. Jews were hidden in convents, monasterys and even the Vatican itself with the Popes encouragement and blessing.
It is obvious to anyone with half a functioning braincell that that Pope had to walk a tightrope to negotiate the difficulties that that time presented to all statesmen
The sad truth is that many people behaved reprehensibly during World War II, and that there are many of us who could hold fast to grievances from that time, if we so choose but we recognize that doing so would not be helpful.
And that Pope Pius XII whatever his human failings were was not one of those whose actions were in any way reprehensible, rather he did his best in very difficult circumstances to stem the tide of inhumanity that was overwhelming Europe.
From where I sit the anti-Catholicism that drives this type of story differs only in degree from the antisemitism that provided the fertilization for the Holocaust.
So let's not forget the horrors of those days and lets keep the blame entirely where it belongs and not use it undermine the meeting of people of good will toward one another - such as Pope Benedict and Riccardo Di Segni, the Chief Rabbi of Rome.
THE peak UN body on climate change has been dealt another humiliating blow to its credibility after it was revealed a central claim of one of its benchmark reports - that most of the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035 because of global warming - was based on a "speculative" claim by an obscure Indian scientist.
The 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which claimed to incorporate the latest and most detailed research into the impact of global warming, appears to have simply adopted the untested opinions of the Indian glaciologist from a magazine article published in 1999.
Not really much I can add to this. However, it's just another rivet popping at the seams as the fallout from ClimateGate gets more and more attention. Poneke has gone through the entire ClimateGate email chain and outlined his conclusions - and it's not a good look for Climate Scientist:
TENDER FOR: Integrating climate change principles into tertiary education and sector training
"climate change principles"?? What, like stacking peer review processes? Like labeling skeptics "deniers"? Like using it as a tool to grow the bureaucracy? Like sacrificing science for consensus? Like suggesting taxation paid to a central world governing body is the solution that will drive sustainability? Like the value in sending thousands of politicians and hangers-on to Copenhagen (Australia alone sent 141 including 4 or 5 representatives from the Police) rather than key people trying the world's first sustainable video conference?
I've obviously got the messaging wrong. I suppose it's people like me that can be blamed for the government needing to spend more on
(Photo: Messaging is very important)
In other news there is this announcement of a Waitangi Tribunal deal coming down the pike
The Crown had signed an agreement in principle with Te Hiku Forum, which represented five Far North iwi with a total of 40,000 members, to settle a number of claims lodged over the part 23 years, Radio New Zealand reported.
Along with Maori co-governance of 90 Mile Beach, the Crown had agreed to pay $120 million and transfer the ownership of Aupouri forest and seven Crown-owned farms.
Co-governance of the beach could provide for a possible name change for the area, known as Te Oneroa a Tohe
The Waitangi Treaty of course had no legal status before 1975 but since then in an ever accelerating process it has been used to transfer publicly owned assets into the hands of Iwi.
Perhaps this wouldn't matter if this had led to an improvement in the lot of the average Maori, but it hasn't and it wont.
The only result of all of this has been and will continue to be the creation of a hereditary Maori ruling class who everybody Maori and European alike have to touch their forelocks to.
And some of the most vocal opponents of the Monarchy are also amongst the strongest proponents for the development of our indigenous class system.
Which is something I find highly ironic.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Michael Laws is a natural born blogger without a blog. He's had to substitute hosting a radio talk back show, writing a column in the Sunday rag and lording it over the cities of Wanganui and Whanganui as their outspoken Mayor, but we know where his true calling lies.
As a natural born blogger, it would be fair to say he knows the beast well. He can think like them, order pizza like them, salivate over women like them and even smell like them, if it weren't for adhering to stringent Council Bylaws passed to keep the air freshener bill down after heated Council debates.
Thus he profiles us bloggers, nailing our anonymous hides to the wall, becoming instantly recognisable should we ever venture out of our darkened rooms to say, attend the annual Star Trek convention.
"Bloggers” are opinionated losers who spend way too much time in darkened rooms. They have porn addictions, staple microwave pizza to their bibs, are blubbery and smell.If you blog, leave a comment on how close you come to the profile.
This peculiar purview has been harboured ever since blogging became the online onanism. Which was the first day some idiot decided to anonymously opine and imagined that people gave a continental.
I’m probably still right. If I was to take a cross-section of bloggers I’d wager that most don’t have a partner or a wardrobe, are in desperate need of a stomach staple and regard deodorant as the devil’s snare. They would also be exceedingly jealous of each other: like literary fiction writers. Too many only children, I suspect.
BUFFETED by complaints about its inaccurate weather forecasts, the Met Office now faces being dumped by the BBC after almost 90 years.
The Met Office contract with the BBC expires in April and the broadcaster has begun talks with Metra, the national forecaster for New Zealand, as a possible alternative.
The BBC put the contract out to tender to ensure “best value for money”, but its timing coincides with a storm over the Met Office’s accuracy.
Last July the state-owned forecaster’s predictions for a “barbecue summer” turned into a washout. And its forecast for a mild winter attracted derision when temperatures recently plunged as low as -22C.
Strategic leak by the BBC to cut a better deal (for them) from the Met Service when they renew the contract or the beginning of the end for the British Met service?
Metra referred to in the story is not NIWA, in fact in recent times they have often been at loggerheads.
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Truth is something human beings are wired for, however, our ability to discern truth or to desire to recognise truth is flawed, due to our flawed nature. It takes a desire for truth above a desire to believe in a certain way to get closer to the truth. In other words, careful deconstruction of ones desires and motives, which (I think) is really only possible with divine help. Otherwise, it's easy to get tangled up and seriously lost. One incorrect assumption can lead a person away from what is true.
Which leads me to why I've made the above reflection. I've been reading up on "annihilationism". It's a belief that those in Hell are not left in eternal torment, they are at some point totally and utterly destroyed by God. It's somewhat similar to believing that when you die you cease to exist (as many atheists do), or when you die you get absorbed back into God (as some New Agers do), or when you die your memory is wiped and you get reincarnated into a different person or animal (New Agers and some other religions).
I used to believe in reincarnation, and it was one of the beliefs I had the most difficulty unbelieving when I finally became convinced in the truth of the Catholic Church and her claim to be the Church establish by God on earth. I think I had difficulty with letting go of this belief because it made sense in regards to holding together other beliefs I had. It reinforced the immortality of the soul, it gave expression to "energy never dies, it just changes form", a byline of mine that I used in various internet forums from a song I loved by Single Gun Theory. Without reincarnation, how I understood myself totally fell apart. I needed to believe this and yet the Church told me this belief was false. It was quite the barrier that I knew I had to overcome, thus my major stumbling block in returning to the Catholic faith.
So, when kindly given Glenn's notes for his podcast on why he believes annihilationism to be true, I can only think, you can convince a person of anything given enough ammunition and will. If I didn't have myself solidly anchored in Catholicism, I might find his arguments compelling. (Except there are too many contradictions in them, so maybe not.) Even Satan is a Scripture scholar, as we find when he tempts Christ in the desert. My friend's distrust of convincing arguments comes back to me with force when reading Glenn's notes. Sorry, Glenn.
In my quest for trying to understand the counterarguments, I have rediscovered a Catholic blog that robustly defends the faith: Biblical Evidence for the Catholic Faith by Dave Armstrong, convert from Evangelical Christianity. His post on Biblical Evidence for Eternal Hell was useful, but not enough. But his latest post(Reply to Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer's "The Canon & Church Infallibility" (An Alleged Disproof of Catholic Development of Doctrine), Pt. IV ), even though it's not on the subject at all where he quotes St Vincent, has been incredibly helpful.
. . . Chapter XX.Interestingly enough, the above quote leads full circle to how I got involved in the whole conversation with Glenn in the first place. Apparently (and he can correct me if I'm wrong on this), he thought that by pointing out to traditional Christians how the traditional view leads to enjoying the suffering of the damned in Hell, that we may think again about our adherence to the traditional notion of Hell, and potentially take on the view that God doesn't punish people forever, he just destroys those who don't get to Heaven.
The Notes of a true Catholic.
[48.] This being the case, he is the true and genuine Catholic who loves the truth of God, who loves the Church, who loves the Body of Christ, who esteems divine religion and the Catholic Faith above every thing, above the authority, above the regard, above the genius, above the eloquence, above the philosophy, of every man whatsoever; who sets light by all of these, and continuing steadfast and established in the faith, resolves that he will believe that, and that only, which he is sure the Catholic Church has held universally and from ancient time; but that whatsoever new and unheard-of doctrine he shall find to have been furtively introduced by some one or another, besides that of all, or contrary to that of all the saints, this, he will understand, does not pertain to religion, but is permitted as a trial, being instructed especially by the words of the blessed Apostle Paul, who writes thus in his first Epistle to the Corinthians, "There must needs be heresies, that they who are approved may be made manifest among you:" as though he should say, This is the reason why the authors of Heresies are not forthwith rooted up by God, namely, that they who are approved may be made manifest that is, that it may be apparent of each individual, how tenacious and faithful and steadfast he is in his love of the Catholic faith.
However, this attempt to get a person such as myself to change my beliefs didn't work. Rather than being revolted by enjoying someone's suffering or just embarrassed by traditional belief, I thought that there must be more to it that I don't understand, and therefore set about trying to find out what the something more was. In other words, as St Vincent says "... that they who are approved may be made manifest that is, that it may be apparent of each individual, how tenacious and faithful and steadfast he is in his love of the Catholic faith."
Thank you Glenn.
Related Links: Front Row Seats in Hell and Loftus on Eternal Torture ~ Baretta Blog
Veratatis Splendor ~ Vatican
Summa Theologica: Question 94. The relations of the saints towards the damned
1. Do the saints see the suffering of the damned? Yes.
2. Do they pity them? No.
3. Do they rejoice in their sufferings? Only indirectly.
[...], It is written (Psalm 57:11): "The just shall rejoice when he shall see the revenge."
Further, it is written (Isaiah 56:24): "They shall satiate [Douay: 'They shall be a loathsome sight to all flesh.'] the sight of all flesh." Now satiety denotes refreshment of the mind. Therefore the blessed will rejoice in the punishment of the wicked.
I answer that, A thing may be a matter of rejoicing in two ways. First directly, when one rejoices in a thing as such: and thus the saints will not rejoice in the punishment of the wicked. Secondly, indirectly, by reason namely of something annexed to it: and in this way the saints will rejoice in the punishment of the wicked, by considering therein the order of Divine justice and their own deliverance, which will fill them with joy. And thus the Divine justice and their own deliverance will be the direct cause of the joy of the blessed: while the punishment of the damned will cause it indirectly.
In 2004 France banned the public display of large crucifixes, and got rid of the Sikh turbans and Jewish skull caps. That legislation also banned Muslim girls from wearing headscarves in state schools.
Now they are looking to ban the burqa (actually, just the veil or niqab). This could do wonders for the photography industry, as more and more Muslim women consider their holiday snaps.
He was arrested after masturbating on a web cam for the benefit of a "fifteen year old girl".
Turns out the thirteen year old girl was in reality a Pennsylvanian flatfoot posing as a thirteen year old girl.
Nor is this the first time Mr Ritter has been caught out this way.
All of which makes me wonder - if a Pennsylvanian Plod can fool Scott Ritter into believing he is a fifteen year old girl then he never really stood a chance against Saddam Hussein.
Friday, January 15, 2010
They also want us to guarantee the safety of these alleged terrorists should they be released back into the wild:
Amnesty International is urging the New Zealand Government to offer international protection to Guantanamo Bay detainees at risk of torture or other serious human rights violations if returned to their home countries.
The press release seemed to say nothing about serious human rights abuses in North Korea and other world hot spots, but did find time to campaign on Climate Change.
On Climate Change they had the cheek to write this:
With so much happening out there in the world (probably the same amount as always, but relative to me having a bit more time to notice, it seems so busy!) I'm going to pick on something trivial as my topic for tonight, because all the major events deserve so much more commentary.
The trivial thing is a post on Kiwiblog about having fines as a percentage of a person's income to ensure the "rich pricks" get hurt as much as the poor folk when they get fined for speeding. I'm against this for several reasons:
Not to celebrate the occasion you understand but to wave a banner reading “It’s Time For A Republic”, an action designed to insult Prince William who will be performing the ceremony.
It is exactly this sort of rude, discourteous and ill mannered behaviour that demonstrates to me why Labour MPs are exactly the sort of people I do not want representing me.
And in fact - they don't!
Says a commenter at DimPost: I was going to find something stupid, vicious, nasty and/or moronic over in the comments at Kiwiblog as an example, but then I realised that’d be like shooting fish in a barrel with nothing in it but dead fish. With a machine gun.
Shooting dead fish in a barrel with a machine gun? That's what you call polite nastiness. This illustrates two things:
1. This is a common feature of most blogs, and that's the nature of the beast.
2. DimPost's own threads are not exempt. I actually think they are funnier, because most of the commenters there love slagging off other bloggers in this false sort of politeness that just comes across as sounding like they are a bit up themselves. I'm being a bit unfair though, because there is no question these guys are our intellectual superiors, so their smug superiority is probably well founded.
PS: Such is my sense of humour, that I have written this post in such a way to continue the irony. We might be able to get this post transferred across the entire blogopshere, like some kind of "add your name to the bottom of the list and pass it on" email. Then again, no-one may comment after all. Maybe I host the world's politest blog ;-)
Thursday, January 14, 2010
To give context to this discovery, a short lesson in science is needed. The term “Constant” is very well known in science. Simply put it is a part of an equation (An equation is merely a mathematical sentence, the Variables are the words) that does not change; they are specific and represent solid concepts. You may have heard of Bohr’s Constant, Hubble ’s Constant, Avogadro’s Constant, there are many of them. There is a new Constant; one that has not been named, but if history is any guide it will be called the Miskolczi Constant, named for the physicist who discovered it.A Constant we are all familiar with is the speed of light. Before Einstein and his famous theory of Relativity E=MC2, it was widely believed there was no limit on speed, just throw a rock from a speeding train and the speed will continue to add up. Einstein and his theory of Special Relativity put a specific limit on speed - the speed of light, beyond which nothing could go. There is a strict energetic limit, and we have recognized that for decades now. Before Miskolczi, it was generally thought that the greenhouse effect could be increased infinitely by adding more and more CO2 molecules into the air. Under the conditions prevailing on Earth, Miskolczi has proved that there is a limit to the greenhouse temperature that cannot be raised. Why is that? The IPCC has been telling us the exact opposite for years. Simple, because just as with Einstein’s E=MC2, there is a strict energetic limit as the Miskolczi Law proves.
What the? Actor and self described activist Danny Glover is using the Haiti earthquake as an example of our failure to respond to Copenhagen:
"We are all in peril because of Global Warming; We are all in peril because of Climate Change ... when we look back at what we did at the climate summit in Copenhagen - this is the response - this is what happens ..."
I'm not sure an earthquake qualifies as an extreme weather event.
Earthquakes are the kind of disaster that falls into the category "Act of God", and God will cop the most blame for this, although the new Climate Change religionists appear keen to blame their own God.
Which leads me to the conclusion that no matter how well we integrate faith and reason, and even if Dawkins got his wish and all religion disappeared from this planet, we would still be left with dumb people.
Haiti is one of the poorest nations in the world, the poorest by far in the Caribbean. And it is a sad fact of life that in any disaster the poor will suffer more than the wealthy. But people are not poor because they are cursed by God - indeed the Beatitudes suggest just the converse in fact
20 Then He lifted up His eyes toward His disciples, and said:The reasons why disasters overwhelm Nations or individuals for that matter is one of the great questions of Theology and one not amenable to sound bites on TV but Pat Robertson is not even close with his suggestion - one which doesn't explain why the Roman Catholic archbishop of Port-au-Prince, Monsignor Joseph Serge Miot, is included amongst the victims.
“ Blessed are you poor,
For yours is the kingdom of God.
21 Blessed are you who hunger now,
For you shall be filled.
Blessed are you who weep now,
For you shall laugh.
22 Blessed are you when men hate you,
And when they exclude you,
And revile you, and cast out your name as evil,
For the Son of Man’s sake.
23 Rejoice in that day and leap for joy!
For indeed your reward is great in heaven,
For in like manner their fathers did to the prophets.
Meanwhile Ngati Kahu chief negotiator Margaret Mutu expresses her views and now we can see the long term game plan.
None of the settlements Maori had made with the Crown to date were full and final, and future generations, led by Maori like the Popata brothers, would come back to the Crown for more.
Ngati Kahu had set out what it considered a full and final settlement for the Far North would look like. "What we got offered was far, far less," Ms Mutu said.
Her people had directed her to accept the deal "for now".
The agreement in principle will be signed by Treaty Negotiations Minister Chris Finlayson with five tribes at Roma Marae in Ahipara on Saturday. It covers the return to Maori of the Aupouri State Forest, seven farms, Ninety Mile Beach and properties from the Government's landbank for claim settlements.
And New Zealand continues down the path that transformed Rhodesia into Zimbabwe.
Monkey With Typewriter explains why:
Single-handedly he has turned the public perception of the Maori Party away from being a nascent political party with enough credibility to sit with the Government at cabinet, and returned it to the position of glorified single-issue pressure group.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
And why is that, you may ask? Well, according to the article, the alien world of Pandora is so beautiful and the 3D makes it so real that fans actually pine for it and are depressed at having to wake up every day in our world.
LOS ANGELES: 'Avatar' may have enthralled worldwide audiences with its imagery of an utopian alien world but movie-goers have complained of depression and even suicidal thoughts after watching the sci-fi hit.We Christians also hope for a better world when we die called Heaven, but it is only in belief in the saving power of the sacrifice of God's son, Jesus Christ that gives us the hope that we will one day be with Him there.
Fans of James Cameron's 3D magnum opus are seemingly finding it hard to separate fact from fiction and Internet forums have been flooded with posts by movie-goers plagued with suicidal thoughts about not being able to visit the planet Pandora, reported CNN online.
North American fan site 'Avatar Forums' has received 2,000 posts under a thread entitled 'Ways to cope with the depression of the dream of Pandora being intangible'.
Forum administrator Philippe Baghdassarian said, "The movie was so beautiful and it showed something we don't have here on earth. I think people saw we could be living in a completely different world and that caused them to be depressed."
When a person's income is $50,000 per year, and their expenditure is $49,000 per year, the result is happiness.
When a person's income is $50,000 per year and their expenditure per year is $51,000 the result is misery.
As you may know the voters of California have twice stated that they believe that marriage should be confined to a one man, one woman proposition.
Now this is being challenged - as "unconstitutional" by the usual suspects.
And we know that whatever the outcome in San Fransisco the ruling will be challenged all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where doubtless it will be found that the "right to Gay Marriage" is enshrined in the constitution of United States if past precedents are any guide. Notwithstanding that the framers of that document would be entirely surprised that the had bestowed such a thing.
Of course what is really behind this endeavor is not the advancement of human rights at all - rather the target is the institution of marriage itself, something the left has been gunning for for over 100 years.
By separating marriage from its primary purpose, that being the raising of the next generation to succeed this one they hope to gain control of the raising of the next so that they may be raised in their (the lefts) own image.
The sad thing is the left has already had singular success in weakening marriage, with no fault divorce and the conferring of marital rights on the unwed and so forth.
The net result of all of this has been the rapid decline in fertility, especially amongst the middle, educated classes. And whereas the raising of a family was once considered the most important thing a couple would do with their lives, children now seem to be viewed more as an impediment to self fulfillment, a nice accessory to have if and when you can afford one or two.
And those that do have multiple children are those from the underclasses, for whom children aren't necessarily an impediment to future hopes, such people have never had much hope of "fulfillment" in the terms understood by elites and since they are rewarded by the State financially for each child.
And it is the children of these people who will inherit the Earth. I wonder what the modern elites will think of the world they create?
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Their Christian father, states -
It is quite funny, because obviously they were searching for images of children that looked happy and free. They happened to choose children who are Christian. It is ironic. The humanists obviously did not know the background of these children…
Obviously there is something in their faces which is different. So they judged that they were happy and free without knowing that they are Christians. That is quite a compliment. I reckon it shows we have brought up our children in a good way and that they are happy.