Skip to main content

Swine Flu - False Alarm?

In the last 24 hours, Mexican health authorities have dramatically revised the mortality figures for the disease.

Although the government cites almost 170 "suspicious" deaths possibly attributable to the new "swine flu" strain, it has never verified more than 20.

Now, after a closer review of those 20 cases, it has revised the number downward, admitting that there are only twelve deaths proven to be associated with the virus throughout the entire country, out of a total of only 260 verified illnesses. However, it is not known how many cases have occurred unreported in people who were never hospitalized.

Although the number of "suspicious" deaths may seem alarming, it is actually tiny compared to the number of total flu deaths that are likely to occur on an annual basis in Mexico.

Indeed, the Mexican government reports that there are an average of 20,000 pneumonia deaths in Mexico every year. Influenza normally kills its victims by causing pneumonia.

The alarmist statements trumpeted by the major media are also in sharp contrast to the total lack of non-Mexican deaths due to the virus. Although the disease has appeared in multiple countries, only one person outside of Mexico has died of it -- a Mexican boy who had crossed into Texas with his family to visit relatives.
So far, no one in NZ seems particularly sick with it, even though swine flu has been identified here.

Related Link: Is There Really an Influenza Epidemic? ~ Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent, LifeSiteNews

Comments

  1. Yes, the MacDoctor is beginning to wonder if this is going to turn out to be too much tequila in the doctor's tea.

    At least the virus actually may cause a "pandemic" this time - just like influenza does every year.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One things for sure, the lefties in America have used this as a distraction to further their nefarious agenda. The msm aiding and abetting as always.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting. The Catholic church is putting in place precautions against flu, the TV news is suggesting that communion wine is not being offered to avoid infection. Is this actually true, or is the wine being still offered, just in individual cups as in many Protestant churches?

    I'd be very concerned if any church was panicking over this issue so much that they would even change Holy Communion out of fear.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unfortunately, it's all true.

    Although it may not be fear that is generating this response, but rather liberal subterfuge.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, I have alot to say about this particular issue, but for now, have decided to bite my tongue.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm shocked to hear it. Well, as I'm not catholic, I'm free to say what I like about it!
    http://sjdennis.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/no-wine-for-communion-swine-flu/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.

Popular posts from this blog

Sine dominico non possumus

This post was inspired by posts on TBR and A Servant's Thoughts on male vs female church attendance. ... "We Cannot Live without Sunday," takes us back to the year 304, when Emperor Diocletian prohibited Christians, under pain of death , to possess the Scriptures, to meet on Sunday to celebrate the Eucharist and to build premises for their assemblies. In Abitene, a small village in what today is Tunis, 49 Christians , meeting in the home of Octavius Felix, were taken by surprise on a Sunday while celebrating the Eucharist, defying the imperial prohibitions. Arrested , they were taken to Carthage to be interrogated by the proconsul Anulinus. Significant, in particular, was the response given to the proconsul by Emeritus, after being asked why he had violated the emperor's order. He said: "Sine dominico non possumus," we cannot live without meeting on Sunday to celebrate the Eucharist. We would not have the strength to face the daily difficulties and not

Hmmmm

The University College London Union will probably never see any irony in this. The president of a London university atheist society has resigned over a row about an image of the Prophet Muhammad. The society at University College London (UCL) published an image on its Facebook page showing "Jesus and Mo" having a drink at a bar. The atheist group was asked by the UCL union to remove it, but refused and started a petition defending its freedom of expression. A student Muslim group began a counter-petition asking for its removal. The cartoon in question of course is designed to be offensive to Christians as well as Muslims. "The society was asked to remove the image because UCLU aims to foster good relations between different groups of students and create a safe environment where all students can benefit from societies regardless of their religious or other beliefs." Source: Muhammad cartoon row leads to resignation

This will scare the liberals

Teenagers in New Zealand are conservative about sex education and abortion. How could this be? After all the sexualisation they have been exposed to, all the State endorsed sex-ed - and they're turning out to be conservative!! Oh, the horror! And David Farrar's polling company did the research. This is hope, people. The young are not lost! Teenagers conservative about sex/abortion – Poll ~ Investigate Daily