Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Lucia Christmas is not a pagan holiday [UPDATE]


This is the time of year when we are told that Christmas is really a pagan holiday that was taken over by the Christians in ancient Rome in order to replace paganism with their own beliefs. Atheists love this and are happy to promote this idea because it reduces the historical certainty of the entry of Christ into our world, and erodes the credibility of Christianity as a whole if it's just paganism transformed into something slightly different. Some Christians also believe that the origins of Christmas are pagan, following in the footsteps of the old Puritans who hated celebrations of any kind, but I hope that if they investigate they will realise that nothing could be further from the truth.

There are two major arguments: that Christmas somehow copied the Roman feast week of Saturnalia, celebrated December 17-23, or that Christmas replaced the birth of the Roman Sun god, that had been celebrated on December 25. Both are ridiculous, as you shall see.

Let's start with Saturnalia, in the words of Fr Longenecker, who has a certain way with them.
When trying to solve the mystery of the relationship between Christmas and the Saturnalia we have to consider not only the similarities, but the differences. The Saturnalia was celebrated from December 17 – 23. Okay that’s pretty close to the December 25 date for Christmas–but if they were copying the Saturnalia, why didn’t the early Christians celebrate the Nativity of Christ on December 17? At the Saturnalia they had a feast. Good. Christians had a feast too. The Romans gave each other gifts as part of the celebration. There’s a match. Christians did too. However, the Romans also wore silly hats, got drunk, danced naked in the streets, propped up the statue of Saturn on a couch to observe the revelries, reversed roles between slaves and masters, and put green drapes around their doorways. None of those fun activities are part of Christmas.

The most glaring difference is in the meaning of the celebration itself. If there were some sort of link with the birth of Christ you would expect that the meaning of the Saturnalia might have something to do with the coming of light in the dark time of the year or the birth of new life in the midst of the cold and dark. The Saturnalia has none of those themes [...]
And then there's the Roman celebration of the birth of their sun god on December 25.  Would be pretty damning, if it weren't for the fact that there is no evidence that this feast was celebrated by the Romans before A.D. 360.  It might even be that December 25 was chosen by them for the birth of their sun god in an attempt to supplant Christmas, which by that time had grown enormously and was no longer persecuted by the Romans, causing more that a bit of consternation by those who believed that the old Roman gods needed to be appeased in order for Rome to regain her strength and vigour.

So, why is Christmas celebrated on December 25?  Fr Longenecker again:

In 386 St John Chrysostom preached a sermon linking the date for Christmas to the date of the Annunciation. He does so in a way that suggests that this was already an established belief. The date of the Annunciation was based on a Jewish tradition that the world was created on March 25. The Jews also believed that a great man would die on the same day as his conception. The date for Jesus Christ’s death was Nisan 15 according to the Jewish calendar, or March 25 according to the Roman calendar. The early Christians (who were of course Jews) concluded that Jesus was therefore conceived on March 25. Thus the day of the world’s creation, and the day of the world’s redemption (and therefore the beginning of the new creation) was March 25.
Nine months after March 25, the conception of Our Lord, is of course, December 25, which is why Christmas is celebrated on December 25.

I'll leave you to discover why Fr Longenecker includes Frodo Baggins in his post title.

Read more: Christmas, Pagan Romans and Frodo Baggins ~ Fr. Dwight Longenecker

UPDATE: With the related question, Was Easter Originally A Pagan Holiday? Short answer - No.

2 comment(s):

leftrightout said...

THE good part of Christmas is not always Christian—it is generally Pagan; that is to say, human, natural.

Christianity did not come with tidings of great joy, but with a message of eternal grief. It came with the threat of everlasting torture on its lips. It meant war on earth and perdition hereafter.
It taught some good things—the beauty of love and kindness in man. But as a torch-bearer, as a bringer of joy, it has been a failure. It has given infinite consequences to the acts of finite beings, crushing the soul with a responsibility too great for mortals to bear. It has filled the future with fear and flame, and made God the keeper of an eternal penitentiary, destined to be the home of nearly all the sons of men. Not satisfied with that, it has deprived God of the pardoning power.

And yet it may have done some good by borrowing from the Pagan world the old festival called Christmas.
Long before Christ was born the Sun-God triumphed over the powers of Darkness. About the time that we call Christmas the days begin perceptibly to lengthen. Our barbarian ancestors were worshipers of the sun, and they celebrated his victory over the hosts of night. Such a festival was natural and beautiful. The most natural of all religions is the worship of the sun. Christianity adopted this festival. It borrowed from the Pagans the best it has.

I believe in Christmas and in every day that has been set apart for joy. We in America have too much work and not enough play. We are too much like the English.

I think it was Heinrich Heine who said that he thought a blaspheming Frenchman was a more pleasing object to God than a praying Englishman. We take our joys too sadly. I am in favor of all the good free days—the more the better.

Christmas is a good day to forgive and forget—a good day to throw away prejudices and hatreds—a good day to fill your heart and your house, and the hearts and houses of others, with sunshine.

Robert G. Ingersoll

Lucia Maria said...

You know, LRO, it's obvious to me from your comment that neither you nor Robert G. Ingersoll have actually read my post that directly contradicts Robert's assertion that Christmas took over the worship of the sun god.

Furthermore, if Christ has not yet come to earth, then most humans beings would be destined to hell. With His coming, those that freely take His hand are pardoned over and over and over again, and are able to make it to the place He has prepared for ALL of us, that not everyone wants to go to.

You can't have Heaven without God. If you don't want to be with God forever, you can't go to Heaven. It's as simple as that.

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.