You'd think an old story that had been totally debunked would have been dead and buried. But no, it's been resurrected, probably as a means of ensuring negative press, even if that press is false, stays out there in the public mind against the Holy Father. I would add that the purpose of naming Benedict XVI as a defendant would also serve the same purpose.
Related links: CNN's appalling attack on the Pope ~ Catholic Culture
CNN Rehashes Old Charges in Attack on Pope Benedict ~ Christian News Wire
Pope Named in Lawsuit by Clergy Sex Abuse Victim ~ Politics Daily
Related links: CNN's appalling attack on the Pope ~ Catholic Culture
CNN Rehashes Old Charges in Attack on Pope Benedict ~ Christian News Wire
Pope Named in Lawsuit by Clergy Sex Abuse Victim ~ Politics Daily
I see also that the Herald has reprinted an attack piece on the Pope by Gwynne Dyer in today's edition. Dyer retreads the old Pope Pius WWII attack *sigh*
ReplyDeleteThese people are like stuck records...
They are like stuck records, aren't they Fletch. It's just all so tedious.
ReplyDelete