Skip to main content

Haunting

How many ghosts are there in the past that we are just blithely unaware of?

I was just re-reading some of Hilaire Belloc's Survivals and New Arrivals today, and then I came across an article on the 1,400 year war. Belloc said "The whole story of Europe looks quite different when you see it from the point of view of the average cultivated Frenchman or Italian from what it does in the eyes of the average educated English or American Catholic." And then, reading the article I quote below on the 1,400 year war, it seems the point of view of the Hungarian is one that cannot be fathomed by those of us living in an Anglo-Saxon Culture.
Having made the mistake of settling in a bad geopolitical neighbourhood, the Magyars would come to see themselves as defenders of the West, to which they did not belong, against the East, to which they did. This resulted in Hungarians having a love-hate relationship with both the East and the West for the next thousand years. “East” meant Mongolian and Tartar marauders at first, but the expansion of the Ottoman Empire during the 15th century gradually changed its meaning to include Islam. The crescent moon became a symbol of menace, as the Muslim world made up for the ground it lost in southwestern Europe by its conquests in the southeast. By victories such as Kosovo, the Prophet’s armies gained in the Balkans what they forfeited in Spain. Eventually their success saw them sweep across the great plains of Hungary and Transdanubia, their high tide reaching the walls of Vienna on two occasions, the last time in 1683.

The Magyars resisted Islam’s advance for nearly a century, but eventually they succumbed at Mohács Field in 1526. After that debacle, Hungary’s 150 years of bondage began. Ottoman rule was not unmitigated evil—for instance, horticulture and architecture flourished under it—but it was still a nightmare of caprice and corruption. The Sultan’s soldiers were fatalistic in combat and merciless in victory. The Porta—the Turkish court—combined dizzying hauteur with abject servility. It also combined, along with its entire culture, Oriental cruelty with Muslim self-righteousness. Most measures were considered justified against the giaours (infidels). The trauma of imperial Islam lingers in the lower Danube basin to this day.
We are especially sheltered because of the period in history that we were born.
I am offering this potted history of the region because my reader is likely to be the product of what I have called “the 60-year gap.” Assuming that he or she was born after 1918 (the year General Allenby rode through the gates of Damascus) but before 1979 (when the Ayatollah Khomeini deposed the Shah of Iran and the mujahedeen began resisting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan), my reader belongs to the only about three generations in 1,400 years during which the struggle between the Islamic and non-Islamic world was on standby. This 60-year gap between the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the resurgence of militant Islam was one of the few periods in which people, as long as they lived in certain sheltered parts of the world, such as Western Europe and North America, could be blissfully unaware that theirs was at war with another.
Belloc also writes of this generation gap. A period of time in which no living person can remember Islam and just how strong it and the civilisation it represented was. Oh, how the ghosts of the past must be raging against what they see as our blindness in this area!

Related Link: The 1,400 year war

Comments

  1. A good read, and thank you for that.

    It got me thinking about the history I had to UE level back in the 50s and early 60s. I was good at the subject and topped the class in my last two years every time. Yet I'm damned if I can remember much being angled towards the Ottoman Empire.. it was always Turkey "The Sick Man of Europe". I had to leave school to learn much about what a colossus that Empire was.
    Much of the European history I learned started in the 18th century and concentrated on Britain.. all other European countries being covered within their various importances to the Brits. The Middle Ages was more a quaint period and of course the Dark Ages was dark to me as well.. leavened only by the Crusades and deeds of honour. Islam was simply the Moors who invaded Spain and were eventually beaten back. I probably learned more about Islam from poetry (Don John of Austria) and English Lit.

    Looking back I'd have to say we were carefully steered around Islam in our history, with any real focus being the Crusades (where we were ostensibly the attackers as opposed to defenders).

    So I can appreciate the "three generation" gap as being reasonably accurate. And I find it interesting that the three best known Western leaders of the War on Terror are a born again Christian, an Anglican perhaps soon to be Catholic and a Methodist lay preacher, and the main military in the field has less than 1% Atheists in it's ranks.

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  2. Similarly, you see in Victorian era literature and early 20thC notes of the starving and bedraggled "Musselman".
    Discovery of oil was very helpful, cheers and thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.