Ok, so I don't want this to come across like a 'conspiracy theory' post or something like that but it probably will. Like (I suppose) most people, I had the idea that the AIDS disease starts with someone contracting the HIV virus which then leads to AIDS; however, I stumbled across a website by accident yesterday which documents a different view, that -
There is no proof that the HIV virus is the cause of, or leads to AIDS.
In fact, HIV is a retrovirus ('an incomplete "side" of a DNA spiral ladder'). According to what I read "Viruses are larger and more complete replicable strands. Generally, the ones that can hurt us get into our cells and replicate themselves, and destroy the cells they get into. This has never been observed with a retrovirus, and certainly not with HIV". This is not just a theory proposed by crackpots, but by many actual scientists, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, professor of molecular biology and one of the world’s leading authorities on retroviruses (who has of course been ostracized by those who want to blame it all on HIV).
It's probably too complicated to post the whole argument here, suffice it to say that I have read enough to be convinced that there is a case to be made that there is no connection between HIV and AIDS. Also see the videos HERE. I was shocked watching this video, and then quite angry that this has been allowed to happen.
The point is made in the videos and the article that the drug that is given to people with suspected HIV (the drug is called AZT) is the most toxic drug every allowed to be given to humans and actually CAUSES a lot of the symptoms we associate with AIDS because the drug " "stops all cell division, not only cancerous cell division, and was never approved as a chemotherapy drug because of its side effects, which include myopathy, or muscular atrophy, and severe bone-marrow toxicity."
The upshot is that many people who have been diagnosed with HIV have been given this drug and killed by it, when there was actually nothing wrong with them (see the example in the video of the adopted "HIV infected" little girl who was taking the drug, complained of her "legs burning", and stopped taking the drugs on the advice of Dr Duesberg. She is fine today, unlike the others in her group who continued the drug and all died). As usual, it's all about MONEY.
Anyway, read the article, watch the video and see what you think...
It's probably too complicated to post the whole argument here, suffice it to say that I have read enough to be convinced that there is a case to be made that there is no connection between HIV and AIDS. Also see the videos HERE. I was shocked watching this video, and then quite angry that this has been allowed to happen.
The point is made in the videos and the article that the drug that is given to people with suspected HIV (the drug is called AZT) is the most toxic drug every allowed to be given to humans and actually CAUSES a lot of the symptoms we associate with AIDS because the drug " "stops all cell division, not only cancerous cell division, and was never approved as a chemotherapy drug because of its side effects, which include myopathy, or muscular atrophy, and severe bone-marrow toxicity."
The upshot is that many people who have been diagnosed with HIV have been given this drug and killed by it, when there was actually nothing wrong with them (see the example in the video of the adopted "HIV infected" little girl who was taking the drug, complained of her "legs burning", and stopped taking the drugs on the advice of Dr Duesberg. She is fine today, unlike the others in her group who continued the drug and all died). As usual, it's all about MONEY.
Anyway, read the article, watch the video and see what you think...