Skip to main content

Chris Trotter on John Key morphing into PM

As I was somewhat distracted on Friday, I didn't get around to typing out Trotter's From the Left opinion piece from the Dominion Post. It's now appeared online, saving me the trouble.

When you deal with the devil, the devil always wins. I think it's notable that people like Trotter are so impressed with Key. So, here's Chris Trotter in full isn't he just wonderful on John Key and his deal with Labour.
Key morphs into prime minister

Okay, I admit it, I was wrong about John Key. What he did on Wednesday afternoon was quite extraordinary. Not only did he help his principal political opponent out of a very deep hole, but he also told the denizens of the far Christian Right that they should stay in theirs.

The pro-smacking lobby was positively salivating at the thought of 18 more months of promoting their creepy version of Christianity to the New Zealand public. And I'm sure their leaders were also secretly delighted at being given such a wonderful opportunity to colonise and subvert the National Party.

Don't laugh. The once proud Republican Party long ago fell prey to these holy red-necks, and even across the Tasman, the influence of Christian fundamentalism in the Liberal and National parties has grown ominously.

There is a deep and disquieting political synergy between the dark emissaries of neo-conservatism and the dogmatic proselytisers of Christian fundamentalism. The former seek an all-encompassing ideology strong enough to control the disintegrative tendencies of liberal capitalism; the latter claim to have found it.

Of late, this neo-conservative- Christian fundamentalist axis of influence appeared to be gaining an impressive amount of political traction. Certainly, something very weird was going on in the National Party.

Like those Transformer monster machines my friends' kids used to watch in the 1980s, the party was changing: reassembling itself into an older, darker and much more dangerous political mechanism. The young, confident and voter-friendly National which John Key has been marketing since the end of 2006 was beginning to look pretty shaky.

Even worse, it was Bill English, the man so many voters had hoped would steer National back into more inclusive and conciliatory waters, who was leading the transformation. The thoughtful and pragmatic representative had morphed into an angry standard bearer for the "power-at-any-price" school of politics.

The "moderate", tipped to be our next finance minister, was demanding massive cuts in government spending and further deregulation of the labour market. Could this really be the Bill English who, seven years ago, at a meeting of the Balclutha branch of the party, had boldly spelt out what National needed to do to regain power?

"The groups that vote for us are the ones who are shrinking fastest . . . We lose 1.5 seats each election just on the demographics alone. The new voters will be young and brown. If we're not getting their vote, we're not going to get into Parliament . . .

"There was a smell that came across the party early in the 90s – too focused on the dollars, not worried enough about the people who were missing out. We didn't do enough to change those impressions . . . There's a perception that rich people vote National, and it's true. I hate that. It would do us good to see us drive some of those people away."

Mr Key's strategy over the past six months has been based squarely on his deputy's Balclutha analysis. From volleyball at Ratana, to walkabouts at McGeehan Close and Waitangi, everything he's done has strobed "National wants to help the people who are missing out".

But, about a month ago, National's pollsters and focus groups started whispering in Mr Key's and Mr English's ears that Helen Clark's stubborn defence of Sue Bradford's "anti-smacking" bill was collapsing Labour's support across all demographics. "Middle New Zealand" was angry and confused about the bill's objectives. The right-wing churches' misinformation campaign was bearing fruit. National had only to keep the fundamentalist cauldron bubbling, and in 2008 New Zealand would be theirs. Or would it?

Mr English was confident that he and his boss could ride the neo- conservative-Christian-fundamentalist tiger, and saw no harm in allowing National to become the instrument of God's righteous wrath.

But Mr Key decided that he didn't want to – and didn't have to – win that way. He had gone into politics to help New Zealanders lift their game not to fight the Battle of Armageddon.

By reaching out to Ms Bradford and Miss Clark and committing his party to a principled compromise on the repeal of s59 of the Crimes Act, Mr Key has made certain that the next National government will be just that – a government.

That's a prime-ministerial transformation.

Conservatives anticipating the Rapture should call Brian Tamaki.

Comments

  1. This article is interesting for it reveals much about Trotter himself.

    First, does he mean that Key is a great guy because he has the same liberal attitude as Trotter on this issue?

    Or does it mean he thinks Key is a great guy because he let Clark off the hook?

    I think it means the latter, because he has created a non-existent bogeyman of shock horror Christians.

    Come election time Trotter will be baying for Key's blood just like every other left wing journalist (if the fat bugger hasn't had a heart attack by then).

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is apparent that politics and honest, rational debate does not work in NZ anymore. Perhaps the only way to get into parliament is to be a backstabbing, self-aggrandizing populist. No wonder politicians are less trusted than used car salesmen.

    The only way to make NZ a better place to live is to change the PEOPLE. Governments come and go. This nation needs the Gospel, full of God's grace and truth.

    What a fool I was for hoping that National could actually make a difference. The only thing that changes a nation's heart is a move of God. I'll be spending more time on my knees petitioning the Lord of ALL earthly governments and kingdoms ...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I agree, we do need more of god's grace.

    I know it will be on show at the funerals for those two young girls killed in Edgeware Rd Saturday night.

    But I wonder where it was when those two girls needed it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Typical post from Trotter.

    I can track him over the last 20 years as the bellwether ewe. He's the quickest to find the new grass and the warm spots.

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rat + sinking ship = Trotter

    ReplyDelete
  6. Trotter is deluding himself. His own creepy philosophy is called inclusivity. It's a buzzword for a trojan horse that houses everything that will white-ant a conservative government. His flattery of Key is like a kiss from Judas. What has not penetrated his thick head is that 80% of NZ are not deluded by his smear that they are being lead by a Christian taliban. They have a thing called common sense instead, and sophists like Key disgust them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, Christians are upset about Bradford's anti-smacking bill, but as far as I can remember, there wasn't anything like 80% of people calling themselves Christian in the last Census; however, there is an 80%+ number who oppose Sue's bill in most public opinion polls.

    So Trotter is scaremongering introducing the Christian angle.

    It's not just the Christians who are against Bradford's bill, Chris; it's ordinary New Zealanders, some of whom happen to be Christian.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.