This just in
The whole argument over the temperature is of course utterly banal - Niwa's adjusted record
shows an increase of 1°C over a time span of 100 years.
An amount so trivial that you wouldn't notice it in real life. Over a time span so long that any implications for agriculture and so forth would be easily catered for.
Still its worth challenging in court - this garbage science, which we pay for, has been used to grow government and increase taxes as well as creating a new parasitic industry - carbon credits.
I doubt anything will come of this, too many vested interests but its worth a go.
The country's state-owned weather and atmospheric research body is being taken to court in a challenge over the accuracy of its data used to calculate global warming.
The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition said it had lodged papers with the High Court asking the court to invalidate the official temperatures record of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (Niwa).
The whole argument over the temperature is of course utterly banal - Niwa's adjusted record
shows an increase of 1°C over a time span of 100 years.
An amount so trivial that you wouldn't notice it in real life. Over a time span so long that any implications for agriculture and so forth would be easily catered for.
Still its worth challenging in court - this garbage science, which we pay for, has been used to grow government and increase taxes as well as creating a new parasitic industry - carbon credits.
I doubt anything will come of this, too many vested interests but its worth a go.
Yes, bring it on as we all know the best science is done in a court and the best scientists all have LLB after their names.
ReplyDeleteGood story on GW on Ian Wisharts site. Seems one of the propagandists got all angry and took his ball home.
ReplyDelete