Skip to main content

Shakespeare may be removed from the curriculum [Update 2]

English school-boy has no idea what his ancestors are talking about
- from The Spectator, 2001

Wow. Shakespeare may be removed from the school curriculum and replaced with (drum roll, please) the study of blogs!

Are the curriculum people insane? No. They know that when you remove content that is measurable and well-studied and replace it with stuff that few people read, then you have no objective way of ensuring standards of teaching are being met and children are being taught anything worthwhile. So, you leave the door open for individual ideologies to be taught instead.

You can therefore create a generation of people who know very little, but think they are well-educated These sorts of people are very easily controlled.

UPDATE: I wonder if the potential removal of Shakespeare from schools is influenced in a large part by his biblical world view?
The influence of a Biblical worldview is evident throughout Shakespeare’s work. His plots are ripe with Biblical principles, lessons and truths. Take, for example, this short summary of themes from some of his most famous plays. Hamlet deals with the theme of revenge, and teaches that “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord” (Rom. 12:19); “All who take the sword will perish by the sword” (Matt. 26:52) Measure for Measure takes its title from Matt. 7:2 and teaches the reader: “Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get” (Matt. 7:1-2). Macbeth demonstrates the dangers of ambition, and the Biblical truths: “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Prov. 16:18); “For what does it profit it man if he gains the whole world and loses his soul” (Matt. 16:26; Mk. 8:36; Lk. 9:25). Much Ado about Nothing deals with the theme of deceptive appearances and warns the reader: “Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment” (Jn. 7:24); “The LORD sees not as man sees; man looks on the outward appearance, but the LORD looks on the heart” (1 Sam. 16:7). The Merchant of Venice conveys a message of mercy and demonstrates the Gospel truth that: “Judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy; yet mercy triumphs over judgment” (Jas. 2:13)

UPDATE 2: Looks like we are merely copying our English forebearers in dropping Shakespeare. In 2001, Philip Hensher wrote in The Spectator (link changed May 2016 as original no longer exists - Lucia Maria):
In a way, anyone who thinks the lower classes have been getting above themselves lately ought to raise a glass to the educational authorities in this country. Even if you aren't given to conspiracy theories, it is hard to suppress the thought that the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, the government's advisory board on state education, is pursuing a long-term class war of devilish ingenuity. Let's not educate them; let's keep them ignorant; let's discourage them from ever reading a book; and we, the leisured rich, will face a future of lolling in our red-velvet dressing-gowns, fed Turkish Delight by a whole generation of illiterate, epsilon-minus semi-morons.
His whole article is a must-read.


Related Links:
Teachers fight to save Shakespeare ~ Stuff
Why study Shakespeare? ~ Oxford Tutorials

Comments

  1. I see that we both feel somewhat similarly on this matter

    http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/10025/

    Your point on control is particularly apposite

    ReplyDelete
  2. As Harold Bloom pointed out, (in 'The Western Canon') Shakespeare said everything there was to say about the human condition. And he taught us to examine ourselves and our assumptions.

    I just can't imagine an education without him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adam, thankyou.

    KG, I agree. There is so much in Shakespeare, that to take him out of education entirely is to eviscerate learning in this country.

    Yet again, I am given more reasons to persevere with home-schooling!

    ReplyDelete
  4. "You can therefore create a generation of people who know very little, but think they are well-educated These sorts of people are very easily controlled."
    Perhaps, but mostly 'rational decision making' requires at the very least a wide base of knowledge and the ability to draw from that ... as a means of hitting the target and reducing collateral damage. An ability that already seems somewhat lost if we look at social and educational policies for example ... and this an artefact, I believe, of not only the 'dumbing down' of education, but also the increased specialisation of 'skill.'
    So "control" of people??? More likely the creation of very 'single minded' dangerous people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The truest and most insightfull comment I have read anywhere for months..

    "Are the curriculum people insane? No. They know that when you remove content that is measurable and well-studied and replace it with stuff that few people read, then you have no objective way of ensuring standards of teaching are being met and children are being taught anything worthwhile. So, you leave the door open for individual ideologies to be taught instead."

    Superb.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "You can therefore create a generation of people who know very little, but think they are well-educated These sorts of people are very easily controlled."


    Obama-ism

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.

Popular posts from this blog

Sine dominico non possumus

This post was inspired by posts on TBR and A Servant's Thoughts on male vs female church attendance. ... "We Cannot Live without Sunday," takes us back to the year 304, when Emperor Diocletian prohibited Christians, under pain of death , to possess the Scriptures, to meet on Sunday to celebrate the Eucharist and to build premises for their assemblies. In Abitene, a small village in what today is Tunis, 49 Christians , meeting in the home of Octavius Felix, were taken by surprise on a Sunday while celebrating the Eucharist, defying the imperial prohibitions. Arrested , they were taken to Carthage to be interrogated by the proconsul Anulinus. Significant, in particular, was the response given to the proconsul by Emeritus, after being asked why he had violated the emperor's order. He said: "Sine dominico non possumus," we cannot live without meeting on Sunday to celebrate the Eucharist. We would not have the strength to face the daily difficulties and not

Hmmmm

The University College London Union will probably never see any irony in this. The president of a London university atheist society has resigned over a row about an image of the Prophet Muhammad. The society at University College London (UCL) published an image on its Facebook page showing "Jesus and Mo" having a drink at a bar. The atheist group was asked by the UCL union to remove it, but refused and started a petition defending its freedom of expression. A student Muslim group began a counter-petition asking for its removal. The cartoon in question of course is designed to be offensive to Christians as well as Muslims. "The society was asked to remove the image because UCLU aims to foster good relations between different groups of students and create a safe environment where all students can benefit from societies regardless of their religious or other beliefs." Source: Muhammad cartoon row leads to resignation

This will scare the liberals

Teenagers in New Zealand are conservative about sex education and abortion. How could this be? After all the sexualisation they have been exposed to, all the State endorsed sex-ed - and they're turning out to be conservative!! Oh, the horror! And David Farrar's polling company did the research. This is hope, people. The young are not lost! Teenagers conservative about sex/abortion – Poll ~ Investigate Daily