Skip to main content

Jesus was just a human after all

Pope Benedict has been spending every spare moment writing about Jesus. He says : "The alleged findings of scholarly exegesis have been used to put together the most dreadful books that destroy the figure of Jesus and dismantle faith." -- Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, 35.

The article I've typed out in full below by Ian Harris, published in the Dominion Post last Saturday, shows clearly why Pope Benedict has felt he needed to write a book for the world on the real Jesus who was the Christ.
Transformed Christ, an exemplar of the timeless mythical hero

Christ a myth? Of course, says the atheist. Never, says the traditional Christian. Yet in coming to diametrically opposite conclusions, both rely on a basic misunderstanding of myth.

Blame history for that. Christians have been too eager to read the Bible in a literal way, as though it was above and beyond the myths they readily recognise in other religions. Atheists have noses adept at sniffing out myths, which they then dismiss as unhistorical unscientific and therefore untrue.

Today, however, and thanks in no part small measure to psychologist Carl Jung and scholar of myth Joseph Campbell, the penny is dropping that the mythic lies at the heart of religion - even a religion as rooted in historical events as Christianity. In recent years a huge scholarly effort has gone into rediscovering the human Jesus who lies buried under centuries of piety, superstition, metaphysical speculation and dogma. The search so far has revealed a sage who encouraged those who heard him to live as if the Kingdom of God was already up and running. It is valuable as far as it goes, because without Jesus there could have been no Christ.

But it is Christ the "anointed one" (that is what the word means), not Jesus, that is the central myth of Christianity and carries it's message about life. The Churches have tended to literalise this myth and set it in concrete. But a literalised myth is doomed. If this one is to make any impression on our secular world, it will have to be seen for what it is: a pointer to something real at the heart of human experience, a doorway into an expanded vision of what life can hold, a vehicle of deeper insight into human nature and it's potential.

English scholar Karen Armstrong reminds us that a historical event has to be mythologised if it is to become a source of religious inspiration. German theologian Albert Schweitzer made the same point a century ago when he described myth as "the clothing in historic form if religious ideas, shaped by the unconsciously inventive power of legend, and embodied in a historic personality".

Other world religions have their own versions of that, but in Christianity the historic personality is Jesus. The legend centres on his death and resurrection experience of his followers. The religious idea is the offer of Goodness in life and life in Goodness. And it was the creative imagination of the Apostle Paul that initially fused all this together.

Paul puts the emphasis not so much on Jesus, a man open to historical enquiry, as on the mythic Christ, who is known subjectively in Christian experience. His achievement was to transform Jesus into the Christ, an exemplar of the timeless mythical hero who dies, is raised to new life, and blazes the trail to a higher mode of being. Those who wish to follow his leading signify this through baptism, where they symbolically identify with Jesus' death and emerge to a new quality of life "in Christ". Ideally, they sustain this by sharing regularly in a ritual meal where they remember Jesus' death, open themselves to his continuing influence, and renew their hope for their community and the world. There are some who deplore this expansion, and wish Paul had been content to leave Jesus as a teacher, healer and model for living. But a myth, rightly understood, in infinitely more powerful than a model. It is creative in the artistic sense. It comes alive in the imagination, or not at all.

Inevitably, given the times, the Christ myth came to be wrapped around with the miraculous, the magical, the other-worldly, and a cosmic slant on sin and salvation. But it does not have to be so encumbered.

Indeed, it is precisely because the secular world has moved on from supernatural assumptions that the Christ myth is today in danger of being eclipsed; for a religious myth loses it's vitality when the world view underlying it undergoes a sea-change. Traditionalists try to save it by insisting that all the old understandings still hold, but that merely hastens it's decline.

A better approach is to break the myth open and recover it's meaning for our own time, beginning with Paul's metaphor of "Christ dwelling in you, and you in Christ". The myth is then free to unfold within the fullness of our secular experience, and totally within this world of space and time.


Jesus of Nazareth on Amazon

Comments

  1. "Today, however, and thanks in no part small measure to psychologist Carl Jung and scholar of myth Joseph Campbell..."

    What does he mean 'today', Jung was born in 1875 and Campbell in 1906. Has Harris only just got around to reading them??

    Who picks newspaper columists anyway?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "The myth is then free to unfold within the fullness of our secular experience, and totally within this world of space and time."

    So many errors and jumbled thinking, typical of a posturing secularist dabbler. Another doomed attempt to place the Almighty King of Kings within a shallow 2D materialist framework.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agreed peasant. This post makes me think this guy is trying to evangelize to atheists by putting things into a non-confrontational, semi-logical basis for adopting a more secular-friendly set of beliefs.

    Naturally, it will not make one iota of difference to an atheist how many toes this guy is prepared to put in the water.

    And I kind of figure paddling on the edges is never, ever, going to yield the same experience as jumping right in.

    That's just my observation from a guy who is sitting on the sidelines wondering how warm the water is. The question is, do I fancy a swim?

    ReplyDelete
  4. hey tipp off catholic
    get real
    god dead never existed
    dot com
    round to my place
    sex drug and rock mr,
    peter quixote

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's just my observation from a guy who is sitting on the sidelines wondering how warm the water is. The question is, do I fancy a swim?

    Yes, they don't call these guys like Harris Sea of Faith guys for nothing. For the record, the sea water is lukewarm, "spew our of mouth" kinda lukewarm in this sea of faith.

    ReplyDelete
  6. God, Harris sounds like he could talk at AET or RSM meetings.

    It just further evidences the idea that ignorance is held up as a virtue these days.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This sunk into my head recently - that there are quite a few people about who consider themselves Christians yet don't believe in a supernatural God, even if they don't always say it in so many words.

    Astonishing. (Read: Different from the way I think.)

    In any era the dominant paradigm always has a way of infecting every philosophy, it seems.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ah! Don Cupitt is the author I am thinking of, who wrote "Sea of Faith". Connections being made.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.