Thursday, March 18, 2010

Andrei I just can't get my head around this one

It is my firmly held belief that abortion is the murder of innocent and helpless human beings.

That being the case would my wanton destruction of the clinics where 17,000+ babies are "terminated" each year be for the "greater good"?

Apparently this defense works for the destruction of public property belonging to Government Communications Security Bureau.

5 comment(s):

big news said...

Based on this court case the answer to your question is no, because this case does not set a legal precedent.

Lucia Maria said...

I think it only works if what you do is anti-war. While as interfering with the sacrifice of babies will be seen as a heinous crime.

leftrightout said...

Well, andrei, you could always test it out in NZ courts. :-)

The defence has been tried, and rejected, in the US in the case of the loonytune murderer of a doctor.

Psycho Milt said...

That being the case would my wanton destruction of the clinics where 17,000+ babies are "terminated" each year be for the "greater good"?

Apparently so, if you can get a jury to believe you. Never mind God working in mysterious ways, nothing tops jury trials when it comes to mysterious outcomes.

MK said...

Never, the left will never accept the destruction of one of their beloved baby-killing slaughter houses. They'll slit their own throats before sparing the unborn from the blade.

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.