It is my firmly held belief that abortion is the murder of innocent and helpless human beings.
That being the case would my wanton destruction of the clinics where 17,000+ babies are "terminated" each year be for the "greater good"?
Apparently this defense works for the destruction of public property belonging to Government Communications Security Bureau.
That being the case would my wanton destruction of the clinics where 17,000+ babies are "terminated" each year be for the "greater good"?
Apparently this defense works for the destruction of public property belonging to Government Communications Security Bureau.
Based on this court case the answer to your question is no, because this case does not set a legal precedent.
ReplyDeleteI think it only works if what you do is anti-war. While as interfering with the sacrifice of babies will be seen as a heinous crime.
ReplyDeleteWell, andrei, you could always test it out in NZ courts. :-)
ReplyDeleteThe defence has been tried, and rejected, in the US in the case of the loonytune murderer of a doctor.
That being the case would my wanton destruction of the clinics where 17,000+ babies are "terminated" each year be for the "greater good"?
ReplyDeleteApparently so, if you can get a jury to believe you. Never mind God working in mysterious ways, nothing tops jury trials when it comes to mysterious outcomes.