Obama avoided a World War today, by ensuring the words "Jesus" were covered in black cloth so they wouldn't be seen on camera at the Catholic University he was speaking at. The University was willing to oblige.
"We cannot rebuild this economy on the same pile of sand. We must build our house upon a rock." said Obama in a speech at Georgetown Catholic University, mollifying Christians around the world with a biblical quote.
I guess Presidents must be seen to be neutral, for fear of upsetting the strong and possibly violent atheist lobby :-) not to mention starting a war with upset radical Islamic Fundamentalists, who still haven't gotten over the Danish cartoons and Iraq (or are they Democrats?).
Some people are a little upset about this White House "cover-up". Questions are naturally asked: Is it that such a backdrop causes offense? Is it that some people cannot figure why it is there? Is it simply easier to squash all religious references?
I don't think so, given the frequent religious references he peppers his speeches with. Just the usual White House worries about spin. Of course, then even this action gets some spin. The end result might be that all speeches are done from the White House, or he has a traveling backdrop of a flag in every single speech. Just the thing to start calls of American imperialism!
I'm not offended, but I am noticing Christian references are increasingly deemed "inappropriate". When this is also the case from a so-called champion of religious tolerance, perhaps the story is more significant than I realise.
Related Link: Religious symbols far too symbolic
"We cannot rebuild this economy on the same pile of sand. We must build our house upon a rock." said Obama in a speech at Georgetown Catholic University, mollifying Christians around the world with a biblical quote.
I guess Presidents must be seen to be neutral, for fear of upsetting the strong and possibly violent atheist lobby :-) not to mention starting a war with upset radical Islamic Fundamentalists, who still haven't gotten over the Danish cartoons and Iraq (or are they Democrats?).
Some people are a little upset about this White House "cover-up". Questions are naturally asked: Is it that such a backdrop causes offense? Is it that some people cannot figure why it is there? Is it simply easier to squash all religious references?
I don't think so, given the frequent religious references he peppers his speeches with. Just the usual White House worries about spin. Of course, then even this action gets some spin. The end result might be that all speeches are done from the White House, or he has a traveling backdrop of a flag in every single speech. Just the thing to start calls of American imperialism!
I'm not offended, but I am noticing Christian references are increasingly deemed "inappropriate". When this is also the case from a so-called champion of religious tolerance, perhaps the story is more significant than I realise.
Related Link: Religious symbols far too symbolic
I just put up a post about this, with the comment that 'full dhimmi status will be granted shortly'.
ReplyDeleteThings are moving fast in the U.S.
Oh my goodness, I thought you were joking and just forgot to put the satire tag on!!!
ReplyDeleteMy first serious post ever...and no-one took me seriously...
ReplyDeleteI feel a Split Enz song coming on...
There you go, the danger of doing satire. You risk being typecast.
ReplyDeleteI bet the White House wouldn't dare ask a Muslim university to cover up any religious symbols. They wouldn't dare..
ReplyDeleteDid not 'Catholic' Georgetown have a choice in the matter? No surprises considering what was on their menu for the first week of Lent.Putting Caesar before IHS is well and truly fashionable in Catholic circles esp. when Caesar is viewed as God. Man of "Hope we can believe in". C'mon Tui.....
ReplyDeleteThankfully though, Our HOPE is in the Lord who made Heaven and Earth.
Well, here is the official Vatican response, Mr.Obama.Inter-continental Ballistic Missals coming your way! That'e right, ICBM's.
ReplyDeleteVATICAN GOING ROGUE
http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2009/04/project-holy-fire-going-rogue.html
Enjoy
Most excellent. And for sure it would reduce the Pope's energy bill. I dare say the electricity output for the Vatican City might even be as much as Al Gore's home.
ReplyDelete