data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e893/8e89333b8a3d0a02d6ef536ae5d3f2ceeed4b864" alt=""
TENDER FOR: Integrating climate change principles into tertiary education and sector training
"climate change principles"?? What, like stacking peer review processes? Like labeling skeptics "deniers"? Like using it as a tool to grow the bureaucracy? Like sacrificing science for consensus? Like suggesting taxation paid to a central world governing body is the solution that will drive sustainability? Like the value in sending thousands of politicians and hangers-on to Copenhagen (Australia alone sent 141 including 4 or 5 representatives from the Police) rather than key people trying the world's first sustainable video conference?
I've obviously got the messaging wrong. I suppose it's people like me that can be blamed for the government needing to spend more on
(Photo: Messaging is very important)
I just put up a post and a link to this at CR.
ReplyDeleteTruth isn't going to derail this scam.